The reaction of ‘Romanticism’ visual artists to the industrial revolution in the 19th. Century
Romanticism (also the Romantic era or the Romantic period) was an artistic
literary and intellectual movement that originated in Europe
toward the end of the 18th century and in most areas was at its peak
in the approximate period from 1800 to 1850. Partly a reaction to the
Industrial Revolution it was also a revolt against the aristocratic social and
political norms of the Age of Enlightenment and a reaction against the
scientific rationalization of nature it was embodied most strongly in the
visual arts, music and literature but had a major impact on historiography,
education and the natural sciences. Its effect on politics was considerable and
complex while for much of the peak Romantic period it was associated with
liberalism and radicalism its long-term effect on the growth of nationalism was
probably more significant. And argued for a natural epistemology of human
activities as conditioned by nature in the form of language and customary
usage. Romanticism reached beyond the rational and Classicist ideal models to
raise a revived medievalism and elements of art and narrative perceived to be
authentically medieval in an attempt to escape the confines of population
growth urban sprawl and industrialism. Romanticism embraced the exotic the
unfamiliar and the distant in modes more authentic than Rococo chinoiserie
harnessing the power of the imagination to envision and escape. Although the
movement was rooted in the German movement which prized intuition and emotion
over the rationalism of the Enlightenment the events of and ideologies that led
to the French Revolution planted the seeds from which both Romanticism and the
Counter-Enlightenment sprouted. The confines of the Industrial Revolution also
had their influence on Romanticism which was in part an escape from modern
realities. Indeed in the second half of the 19th century Realism was
offered as a Polarized opposite to Romanticism. Romanticism assigned a high
value to the achievements of heroic individualists and artists whose pioneering
examples it maintained would raise the quality of society. It also vouched for
the individual imagination as a critical authority allowed of freedom from
classical notions of form in art. There was a strong recourse to historical and
natural inevitability a Zeitgeist in the representation of its ideas. Defining
the nature of Romanticism may be approached from the starting point of the
primary importance of the free expression of the feelings of the artist. The
importance the Romantics placed on untrammeled feeling is summed up in the
remark of the German painter Casper David Friedrich that the artist’s feeling
is his law. To William Wordsworth poetry should be the spontaneous overflow of
powerful feelings. In order to truly express these feelings the content of the
art must come from the imagination of the artist with as little interference as
possible from artificial rules dictating what a work should consist of
Coleridge was not alone in believing that there were natural laws governing
these matters which the imagination at least of a good creative artist would
freely and unconsciously follow through artistic inspiration if left alone to
do so as well as rules the influence of models from other works would impede
the creator’s own imagination so originality was absolutely essential. The
concept of the genius or artist who was able to produce his own original work
through this process of creation from nothingness is key to Romanticism and to
be derivative was the worst sin. This idea is often called romantic
originality. Not essential to Romanticism but so widespread as to be normative
was a strong belief and interest in the importance of nature. However this is
particularly in the effect of nature upon the artist when he is surrounded by
it preferably alone. In contrast to the usually very social art of the
Enlightenment Romantics were distrustful of the human world and tended to
believe that a close connection with nature was mentally and morally healthy.
Romantic art addressed its audiences directly and personally with what was
intended to be felt as the personal voice of the artist. So in literature much
of According to Isaiah Berlin Romanticism embodied a new and restless spirit
seeking violently to burst through old and cramping forms a nervous
preoccupation with perpetually changing inner states of conscious a longing for
the unbounded and the indefinable for perpetual movement and change an effort
to return to the forgotten sources of life a passionate effort at
self-assertion both individual and collective a search after means of
expressing an unappeasable yearning for unattainable goals. The group of words
with the root Roman in the various European language such as romance and
Romanesque has a complicated history but by the middle of the 18th
century romantic in English and romantique in French were both in common use as
adjective of praise for natural phenomena such as views and sunsets in a sense
close to modern English usage but without the implied sexual element The
application of the term to literature first became common in Germany, where the
circle around the Schlegel brothers, critics August and Friedrich, began to speak of romantische
Poesie ("romantic poetry") in the 1790s, contrasting it with
"classic" but in terms of spirit rather than merely dating. Friedrich
Schlegel wrote in his Dialogue on Poetry (1800), "I seek and find
the romantic among the older moderns, in Shakespeare, in Cervantes, in Italian
poetry, in that age of chivalry, love and fable, from which the phenomenon and
the word itself are derived."[17] In
both French and German the closeness of the adjective to roman, meaning
the fairly new literary form of the novel, had some effect on the sense of the word in those
languages. The use of the word did not become general very quickly, and was
probably spread more widely in France by its persistent use by Madame
de Staël in her De L'Allemagne (1813),
recounting her travels in Germany.[18]
In England Wordsworth wrote in a preface to his poems of 1815 of the
"romantic harp" and "classic lyre",[18]
but in 1820 Byron could still write, perhaps slightly disingenuously, "I
perceive that in Germany, as well as in Italy, there is a great struggle about
what they call 'Classical' and 'Romantic', terms which were not subjects of
classification in England, at least when I left it four or five years
ago". It is only from the 1820s that Romanticism certainly knew itself by
its name, and in 1824 the Académie française took the wholly ineffective
step of issuing a decree condemning it in literature.
Unsurprisingly, given its rejection on principle of rules, Romanticism is
not easily defined, and the period typically called Romantic varies greatly
between different countries and different artistic media or areas of thought. Margaret
Drabble described it in literature as taking place "roughly between
1770 and 1848",[21] and
few dates much earlier than 1770 will be found. In English literature, M. H. Abrams
placed it between 1789, or 1798, this latter a very typical view, and about
1830, perhaps a little later than some other critics.[22] In
other fields and other countries the period denominated as Romantic can be
considerably different; musical Romanticism, for example, is generally regarded
as only having ceased as a major artistic force as late as 1910, but in an
extreme extension the Four Last Songs of Richard
Strauss are described stylistically as "Late Romantic" and were
composed in 1946–48.[23]
However in most fields the Romantic Period is said to be over by about 1850, or
earlier.
The early period of the Romantic Era was a time of war, with the French
Revolution (1789–1799) followed by the Napoleonic
Wars until 1815. These wars, along with the political and social turmoil
that went along with them, served as the background for Romanticism.[24]
The key generation of French Romantics born between 1795–1805 had, in the words
of one of their number, Alfred de Vigny, been "conceived between
battles, attended school to the rolling of drums".
The more precise characterization and specific definition of Romanticism has
been the subject of debate in the fields of intellectual history and literary
history throughout the 20th century, without any great measure of consensus
emerging. That it was part of the Counter-Enlightenment, a reaction against the Age of Enlightenment, is generally accepted.
Its relationship to the French Revolution which began in 1789 in the very
early stages of the period, is clearly important, but highly variable depending
on geography and individual reactions. Most Romantics can be said to be broadly
progressive in their views, but a considerable number always had, or developed,
a wide range of conservative views,[26] and
nationalism was in many countries strongly associated with Romanticism, as
discussed in detail below.
In philosophy and the history of ideas, Romanticism was seen by Isaiah
Berlin as disrupting for over a century the classic Western traditions of
rationality and the very idea of moral absolutes and agreed values, leading
"to something like the melting away of the very notion of objective
truth",and hence not only to nationalism, but also fascism and totalitarianism,
with a gradual recovery coming only after the catharsis of
World War II.For the Romantics, Berlin says,
in the realm of ethics, politics, aesthetics it was the authenticity and
sincerity of the pursuit of inner goals that mattered; this applied equally to
individuals and groups — states, nations, movements. This is most evident in
the aesthetics of romanticism, where the notion of eternal models, a Platonic
vision of ideal beauty, which the artist seeks to convey, however imperfectly,
on canvas or in sound, is replaced by a passionate belief in spiritual freedom,
individual creativity. The painter, the poet, the composer do not hold up a
mirror to nature, however ideal, but invent; they do not imitate (the doctrine
of mimesis), but create not merely the means but the goals that they pursue;
these goals represent the self-expression of the artist's own unique, inner
vision, to set aside which in response to the demands of some
"external" voice — church, state, public opinion, family friends,
arbiters of taste — is an act of betrayal of what alone justifies their
existence for those who are in any sense creative. In northern Europe,
the Early Romantic visionary optimism and belief that the world was in the
process of great change and improvement had largely vanished, and some art
became more conventionally political and polemical as its creators engaged
polemically with the world as it was. Elsewhere, including in very different
ways the United States
and Russia,
feelings that great change was underway or just about to come were still
possible. Displays of intense emotion in art remained prominent, as did the
exotic and historical settings pioneered by the Romantics, but experimentation
with form and technique was generally reduced, often replaced with meticulous
technique, as in the
poems of Tennyson
or many paintings. If not realist, late 19th-century art was often extremely
detailed, and pride was taken in adding authentic details in a way that earlier
Romantics did not trouble with. Many Romantic ideas about the nature and
purpose of art, above all the pre-eminent importance of originality, continued
to be important for later generations, and often underlie modern views, despite
opposition from theorists.
In literature, Romanticism found recurrent themes in the evocation or
criticism of the past, the cult of "sensibility"
with its emphasis on women and children, the heroic isolation of the artist or
narrator, and respect for a new, wilder, untrammeled and "pure"
nature. Furthermore, several romantic authors, such as Edgar
Allan Poe and Nathaniel Hawthorne, based their writings on
the supernatural/occult and human psychology.
Romanticism tended to regard satire as something unworthy of serious attention,
a prejudice still influential today.
No comments:
Post a Comment